|
![]()
This is a comparative research study of the United Way in the U.S., and its comparative counterpart, the Community Chest, in Japan. The United Way in the U.S. has almost monopolized the function of domestic donations in the U.S. during its history of about 100 years. It has done this primarily through the system called "workplace-based fund-raising" through the "invention" of the "payroll deduction plan." On the other hand, the Community Chest in Japan has collected close to 500 billion yens in donations during its history of about 50 years, mainly through a system called "family-based fund-raising" through the "magic" of deductions and donations in lump sums of a community fund which is based on chonai-kai, or local community-based associations. The United Way system in the U.S. and the Community Chest in Japan seem to have different kinds of organization and different methods of collecting money, at first glance, except for that both have been "philanthropic giants" of each country. But they do have a common point--that both are systems which were well-planned for collecting as much money as possible from their donors, but both have been neglectful for many years of the way in which their donors' desires and intentions could be taken into consideration. Specifically, both the American and Japanese systems reflected regarding which nonprofit organization or social service would use their money. However, a change then started taking place, first in the United Way. In the 1970s it began to be challenged by alternative fund movements, such as the "Black United Funds" and the "Combined Health Agency Drive." And later, in the 1980s--toward the end of the 80s and the beginning of the 90s--the United Way fearfully started to accept the "Donor Option" plan, and then the "Donor Choice" plan. In addition, the final push on this change was what is called the "United Way Scandal" of 1992, which undermined the American citizens' trust in the United Way. On the other hand, the Community Chest in Japan survived until now--fortunately or unfortunately--without experiencing such a loss of trust in their organization equivalent to that of the "United Way Scandal." But the present is not a time like the postwar period, when the Community Chest played a big role against starvation and poverty just after World War II. So, modern donors do not automatically trust and accept the Community Chest blindly. These modern donors try to self-manage their own act of philanthropy, just as they do something like a portfolio of stock investment. It is thus a big subject for the Community Chest--which is all over Japan as 47 chapters, and its central institution, which has its main office in Tokyo, as the central network council--as to how their organization needs to be changed, and how their programs need to be changed for these modern donors. In this study, the origin of chonai-kai, or the local community-based association system, is mentioned, on which Japan's Community Chest has depended--that is, in the tonari-gumi, or "neighbors' ties," which was a part of the all-out plans of the Japanese military during World War II. Also, the fact that this kind of local community-based association still holds an invisible power over the ordinary people, in regulating their individual lives--especially in country districts and in lower-class areas in big towns and cities--is mentioned as well. Through this study, the aim is to make clear the differences in both countries' donation culture and, at the same time, to deal with the problem of "missing the desires and intentions of donors," which has been common to both fund-raising systems in both countries.
Macro-economic crises are very common in developing countries. They may have serious, often even fatal, implications to the organisation and the work of Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs). During macro-economic crises NGO resources are stretched to a limit as income is dramatically reduced and the demand for NGO services increases, due to growing unemployment and poverty. At a time when NGOs' service provision is most needed the reduction in NGO resources will lead to projects being cancelled, essential maintenance work postponed, staff fired, and excessive organisational attention being devoted to economic issues. Thus the sustainability and continuity of the NGOs' development work may be seriously damaged. Many NGOs may close some or all of their activities leaving important voids in service provision. Local NGOs are particularly vulnerable to macro-economic crises since they are more likely to depend on local rather than international funds. Despite the potential gravity of the impacts of economic crises on NGOs, this subject has received little academic attention beyond some references to the instability of funding many NGOs have to cope with. We lack specific research on the effects of macro-economic cycles on NGOs. In times when developing an 'alternative' or local funding basis is widely promoted by official donors and seen as a fundamental step towards sustainability of the NGO and its work, it is essential to understand the impact of changes in the availability of local funds on NGOs. This research consists of an international case-study comparison, one NGO in Mexico and another in Portugal. Mexico faces very intense economic crises, common to Southern countries, while Portugal faces mild economic crises, common to Northern countries. This comparison should bring an interesting dimension to this exploratory research. Thus far, after the conclusion of the Mexican case-study, the data collected has confirmed the thesis that economic crises have an important impact, both short and long term, on the work and organisation of the NGO. This observation is based on the case of Fovaso, A.C., a local Mexican NGO working in rural development and welfare, which depends solely on local funding. The implications of a macro-economic crisis in Mexico has led to profound changes in the way this NGO operated and even the way it perceived itself and the problem of underdevelopment. The crisis marked a major turning point in relation to its identity and its modus operandis. A few observations can be advanced at this stage. a) From an initial, before the crisis, 'welfare perspective' towards the problem of poverty and underdevelopment the NGO adopted, after the crisis, a 'self-help' and 'income generating' perspective. The NGO reduced its giving in the form of 'handouts' and increased its lending through micro-credits. b) From working with the poorest before the crisis, the NGO shifted to working with beneficiaries who were not the poorest (second lower quintile). c) Some projects which had been started were abruptly suspended and many long term services dramatically reduced to cope with the fall in resource availability. A period of almost paralysis beset the NGO and its programmes during the crisis. d) At the same time attention was shifted towards some profit making enterprises to generate its own income. Thus, during the crisis the quantity and quality of the service provided to beneficiaries was strongly reduced. e) Important changes were registered in relation to the NGO's structure, strategy and culture. Following the reduction of income the leaders enforced very rigid financial control systems to ensure financial restraint, and organisational survival. The 'bureaucratisation' of many tasks and extensive reporting were introduced as income decreased. An interesting contrast can be made with generalised observation that NGOs 'bureaucratise' as their income and organisation grows. Participation by both staff and beneficiaries was almost eliminated and a top-down, centralised, management style was adopted. In many ways the NGO adopted a firm-like organisation to survive. f) The economic crisis was accompanied by a loss of credibility of the leadership of the NGO and a generalised confusion about power in the organisation. These observations will be contrasted with the Portuguese case in the second part of this study.
These (provisional) findings raise a number of questions about
NGOs' ability, in times of
macro-economic crises, to compensate for the reduction of state
service provision. It also raises
questions about local NGOs' ability to promote a sustainable
development, especially in regions
where economic crises are frequent. Also, and for all the above,
macro-economic crises put
enormous stress upon the management capabilities of NGOs. NGO
management must be
innovative and creative to survive them. Donors could arguably
play a role in an attempt to
reduce the negative impact of economic crises upon local NGOs
thus facilitating development.
This paper investigates the dynamics of social service
provision in Greece focusing on the
relationship between nonprofit social service organizations and
the state. The perspective
employed is organizational-political and points to the necessity
of understanding the structural
outcomes of state-nonprofit interactions. I ask: How do
states encourage or discourage nonprofits
to assume particular organizational types or forms? I
define organizational forms as the set of
administrative, economic, technical, and professional
characteristics of organizations.
I show that the heterogeneity of nonprofit organizational
forms that comprise the Greek
third sector is mainly the outcome of inconsistent and sporadic
state policies toward third sector
organizations. While traditionally organizations in given policy
domains have been supported and
controlled by the state, organizations in other policy areas have
been left to their own devices.
Moreover, there is no legislation specifically designed for third
sector organizations. Instead there
is a multiplicity of possible legal forms that a nonprofit can
take. The latter has led to the
existence of a range of types or forms of social service
organizations.
I base my discussion on archival research and the analysis
of a recent EU funded data set
(VOLMED) which includes basic data on the financial and
administrative relations of Greek social
service nonprofit organizations and the state. Through the use of
this data set and of government
statistics on governmental organizations, I create an empirical
typology of the varieties of state-controlled and
state-independent or quasi-independent organizational forms that
exist in the Greek
nonprofit sector. Thus, I attempt to begin making arguments that
link state policy and the
development of particular organizational forms.
The first sociological observations on the environmental
movement and environmental
NGOs in Russia appeared during the ascending wave of the protest
at the end of the 1980s. The
ecological element of Perestroika attracted the special attention
of researchers because of the
intensity of collective social actions. The principal
intellectual effort was to test Western models
of social movements in the Russian context. The environmental
movement in Russia was
compared with early Western social movements. Several frames
were used to conceptualize the
Russian transformation. Institutional development of
environmental NGO has been conceptualized
in the frame of resource mobilization theory. Perestroika
environmental movements have been
framed in a political process model, with the emphasis on
political opportunities, political cycles,
and protest mobilization as developed in the works of Tilly and
Tarrow.
However, after market reforms of January 1992 the term
"transition to democracy" is
rarely used in sociological studies. Russian sociologists
analyze the environmental movement after
Rio as a part of risk society in which large scale environmental
disasters can occur because of the
decline in economic infrastructure. In this situation the
environmental movement should be
preserved through governmental policies, which the Russian
government is unable to develop
(with few exclusions). To some extent, the Russian third sector
develops and functions because
of the international support.
The Soviet command-and -control regime restored itself in
Russia in the conditions of the
posttotalitarian period through monopolization of natural
resources and converted its power into
property. The Russian population continues to be dependent and
subordinate to authorities. The
population's concern is about stability, however, and not in the
environmental modernization of
production. The most part of the population is strongly
interested in economic growth and
development projects. The idea of public participation is
strongly opposed by the myth of
"competence". Science is commonly considered as a "forth sector"
-- an independent force on
political scene. The myth is supported by all interested parties
in environmental decision-making
which apply to scientific reasons to approve creditability of
their positions. "Incompetence"
usually ascertained as not being allied to scientific elite is
considered crucial for expelling parties
from dialogue. The scientific community supports this view in
attempt to get rent from its social
position.
Respondents indicate the lack of grass roots environmental
movement in Russia. The
movement is almost all institutionalized in environmental NGOs.
Most NGOs inherit the
structural features and organizational traditions of the Soviet
public organizations. Democracy
is viewed mostly as commission of rights through various election
procedures. With inflexible
management such democracy fail to operate on a cost-effective
basis.
The main contextual differences in Russia and the West are
determined by differences in
the interrelationships between the governmental sector, NGOs and
the population. Respondents
argued that NGOs and the government in Russia are mutually
interdependent and adapted to each
other. They collaborate in the development of environmental
policy programs. However, these
programs are unrealistic. The respondents indicated that the
biggest problem in the Russian third
sector is the lack of exposure with the population. Neither the
government nor NGOs encourage
public participation. A very limited number of people is
involved in environmental decision
making, thus making interpersonal relations and personal
abilities crucial. Personification of
organizational politics makes the field subjected to conflicts
which further reduce public support.
This paper represents both a literature review and results
of qualitative research conducted
by the method of semi- structured interview and participatory
observation. A set of core questions
addressing environmental NGOs development was used as a basis for
interviews of forty-five
Russian respondents. Participant observation was used as a
supplementary tool to support and
clarify the data received in the interviews.
Letter = U
no U
Letter = U, V
The conference paper will focus on the position and
functions of nonprofit organizations
in Hungary, in a transitional country.
The approach of the special functions of non-governmental
organizations comes from the
everyday experiences and from nonprofit experts' opinion and
literature: NPOs are in very close
connection with public institutions and the cooperation between
the two sectors is mainly fruitful.
Public institutions are lack of financial resources mainly
due to the general crisis of the
economy. Education, health, culture, etc. suffer from shortage of
financing. At the same time it
can be observed that a lot of new services appeared in the field
of human services. Not only
forprofit companies but public institutions offer new
opportunities for their clients. The initiative
comes from the public institutions themselves but, the
institution in question plays only the role
of an incubator.
It is documented that nonprofit organizations have been
establishing in the frame of public
institutions in the transition countries. (Kuti, 1996,
Lévai, 1996, Szalai, 1997, Vajda, 1995). The
special issues emerging in transitional countries are discussed
mainly by researchers living in those
countries.
The initiative mainly comes from the employees of the public
institution. They feel an
urgent need, a challenge to improve the quality and the extend of
services provided by their
institution, but neither financial nor personal background are
available for renewal. The only
possibility is to set up a nonprofit organization (mainly
foundation) and looking for additional
resources as a nonprofit. They can apply in the frame of a
nonprofit to different grant-making
foundations and even to public funds.
The paper will discuss the process how the newborn nonprofit
organizations are growing
up, are looking for new roles again and again, and try to find
their proper place in the society and
economy. At the same time it is a process in the course of which
nonprofit organizations are
taking over a part of the services of the public sphere.
References:
Kuti, Éva (1996): The nonprofit sector in Hungary Johns
Hopkins Sector Series 2 Manchester University Press,
Manchester and New York
Lévai, Katalin (1996): Az önkormányzatok
és a nonprofit szektor közötti
együttmûködésrõl (On the
cooperation
between the local governments and the nonprofit sector) pp. 22-35
(In: Lévai and Straussman eds.: Innovatív
önkormányzatok) Helyi Társadalom Kutató
Csoport, Budapest
Szalai, Júlia (1997): Az
egészségügyi
alapítványokról (On foundations of health)
Kézirat, Budapest
Vajda, Ágnes (1995): Foundations, associations and
governmental institutions pp. 403-421 Acta Oeconomica Vol.
47 Number 4-5
To achieve the goal of sustaining employment in a society
facing the end of work, Jeremy
Rifkin (1995: 256-267) has proposed that the role of the third
sector as a locus of valued work
become more fully developed. Specifically, he suggests that
third sector organizations augment
their employment roles, supported by public and philanthropic
policies providing 1) "a social wage
for community service" and 2) "shadow wages for voluntary
work".
The action research we are conducting employs the
methodology of the Delphi study to
identify ideas for innovative practice directed toward the
provision of work and employment
among third sector organizations in a range of countries. By
opening a new institutional field,
the third sector, to the interests of a wide range of
institutional leaders in a number of countries,
the study aims to alleviate the impending world-wide crisis of
uneven underemployment.
An initial identification of policy initiatives began with a
plenary panel presentation tot the
1997 Second World Assembly of CIVICUS, meeting in Budapest 23-26
September. Prof. Van
Til served as chair for this panel, and which included ISTR
colleagues Antonin Wagner, Arthur
Williamson, and Marianne Nylund. A Delphi instrument was
presented to those attending the
session, and distributed to other participants at the CIVICUS
Assembly. The Delphi instrument
probed respondents' judgments of the ways in which work and
employment might be extended
by third sector organizations.
The report to the ISTR conference will include: 1) An
updated report on the state of the
employment crisis in a number of countries, and the progress of
the Rifkin proposals in those
countries; 2) A summary of the initial recommendations of the
CIVICUS participants regarding
potential actions that may be productively developed in their
various countries, and 3) An
opportunity for ISTR members to add their own policy suggestions
to those previously provided
to the Delphi process.
Las empresas sociales son organizaciones privadas, que
realizan una actividad económica dirigida
al mercado pero su objetivo son la satisfacción de
necesidades sociales. La persistencia de
desequilibrios tales como un paro estructural elevado y las
dificultades de las politicas sociales
tradiciionales junto con la necesidad de pasar de
políticas más activas de integración, llevan
a
preguntarse en qué medida el tercer sector puede
contribuir a resolver estos desequilibrios y,
eventualmente, tomar relevo a los poderes públicos en
ciertos ámbitos de actuación.
El objetivo de esta comunicación es presentar el
resultado de un proyecto de investigación sobre
las empresas sociales y su papel como instrumento que facilita la
integración económica de
personas excluidas. (SEC97-1309 Proyecto de I+D del Programa
Nacional de Estudios Sociales
y Económicos). Este estudioi se centra en la realidad de
la empresa social en España. Sin
embargo, forma parte de un proyecto de ámbito
transnacional (CT 953008 PL953373) (TN9 del
Programa TSER: Recherche sur l'integration social et l'exclusion
sociale en Europe, de la D.G.
XII de las Comunidades Europeas).
La metodología que se utiliza es el método del
caso. En esta comunicación se presentaran los
resultados obtenidos de la realización de 30 casos entre
empresas de inserción que se consideran
excelentes y que desarrollan su acción económica y
social en el ámbito geográfico de España.
Son
empresas surgidas a partir de:
- la iniciativa de un grupo de promotores sociales que
constituyen empresas de inserción social por
el trabajo; el objetivo de la empresa es la rehabilitación
económica y social de parados de larga
duración con niveles de exclusión social,
- la asociación de padres de familias con hihos
discapacitados que se organizan para crear centros
especiales de trabajo y talleres ocupacionales con el objetivo de
garantizar una actividad productiva
y una cierto independencia económica a sus hijos,
- aquellas iniciativas empresariales que actúan en el
ámbito de la sroga; los puestos de trabajo se
crean para que personas con grandes dificultades puedan
ocuparlos, y
- otras iniciativas de raíz social, cuyos origenes y
motivaciones merecen ser estudiadas como
posibles alternativas.
El resultado del estudio de casos ha de permitir:
Plantear las condiciones sociales, institucionales y
económicas que permiten explicar el por qué
del surgimiento de iniciativas empresariales con objetivos
sociales,; es decir, las raxones que
yacen detrás de la utilización de la empresa como
instrumento para alcanzar objetivos diferentes
al que tradicionalmente se le asocia.
Examinar las fórmulas jurídicas que emplean.
Presentar la realidad empresarial de estas empresas sociales
asi cómo sus potencialidades y
limitaciones.
Analizar las posibilidades de la empresa social como
instrumento de política activa de empleo.
Realizar un análisis prospectivo del sector, incidiendo
en aquellos factores clave para su mejor
vetebración.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze women's
participation in the third sector in
Argentina, in particular their role in fostering economic, social
and political change in Argentina.
Women's voluntary participation in public policy making through
their voluntary work and
philanthropic activities, has been one of the most distinctive
features of the relationship between
the third sector and the State in Argentina (Thompson, 1995;
Viladrich, Thompson; 1996). Since
the return to democracy in 1983, a "new map" of women's non
governmental organizations
(NGOs) emerged called to challenge the relationships between the
state, the profit, and the non-profit sectors. By leading a wide
number of civic and non-profit organizations, women have
steadily contributed to the strength of the democratic transition
in Argentina, while enhancing their
status as active agents of social change in different areas such
as: social development, political
participation, consumer advocacy, civic and reproductive rights,
grassroots leadership, etc. Far
from trying to cover this wide range of female participation, my
paper will emphasize main
aspects, achievements and obstacles of women's participation in
the consolidation of the third
sector in Argentina.
My methods will combine different sources: secondary data
based on quantitative and
qualitative research of women's participation in the third sector
(e.g. number, composition, areas
of interest, etc.) as well as primary data obtained from in-depth
interviews with leaders and key
informants of women's organizations. I will provide examples of
both women's NGOs current
alliances and conflicts in dealing with the government and
political parties, as well as illustrations
of new collaborative forms between women's NGOs and the profit
sector. Regarding the latter,
I will examine the growing role of female private philanthropy
where women have provided either
their voluntary work, or their money as recipients of grants or
salaries. Particularly, I will study
the growing importance of women as entrepreneurs in grant making
foundations.
Finally, I will develop both a theoretical and an
operational model in order to analyze the
role of women's organizations in the third sector in Argentina. I
hope this model will be useful
to the design of comparative framework which could be applied to
other countries as well.
Several recent experiments in the United States have applied
the "small business incubator"
model of economic development to the nurturance of nonprofit,
charitable organizations to serve
social and community development. Business incubation is a
dynamic, efficient process to foster
the growth of young firms, helping them to survive and expand in
a safe haven during the start-up
period when they are most vulnerable to failure. "Incubators
provide hands-on management
assistance, access to financing and orchestrated exposure to
critical business or technical support
services" (NBIA, 1997, p. 1). They also often offer low-cost
space, shared support services, and
a network of peers and seasoned professionals with whom new
entrepreneurs and advocates can
develop their organizations--often all under one roof. This
paper will compare and contrast
several models of nonprofit incubators currently operating in the
United States (Dundjerski, 1997),
and one proposed in Israel [Sharir, 1997]), as well as current
for-profit models (See Molnar,
1998). The results should be helpful for considering whether
such models might be useful to other
countries and states that are seeking to broaden or strengthen
their third sectors.
Specifically noted will be the evolution of one such
innovative, "cost-shedding" design:
NEW - Nonprofit Enterprise at Work, a community
"incubator" of nonprofit organizations that
opened its doors in 1993, in Ann Arbor, Michigan (Vinokur-Kaplan
& Connor, 1997). The
authors (an academic and a practitioner) analyze and evaluate
NEW's level of success in enhancing
the growth and development of nonprofit organizations in the
local county area.
Particularly examined are NEW's original strategies for
nurturing nonprofits and enhancing
their efficiency:
1. Consolidated Space & Facilities: A new,
well-designed office building, underwritten by
community contributors, provided office space for 25 small, local
nonprofits, with rentals costing
well-below market rate. Therein, shared support and
informational services, as well as meeting
space, were available to all tenants. This arrangement allowed
the tenants to maximize allocating
their resources towards provision of services;
2. Cross-Fertilization and Synergy of Ideas and
Information: the deliberate designation of
the mix of tenants' foci (at least 25% human services, 25% arts,
music and other cultural groups,
and 50% other types of organizations [e.g. ecology, advocacy,
education, international
awareness]), promoted new, synergistic relationships and
developed new projects among the tenant
agencies and other affiliated organizations.
3. Accessible Address for Nonprofit Activities:
These attractive facilities were also made
available to established and fledgling nonprofits in the area,
for both their own meetings and for
collaborative, inter-organizational meetings. This facet allowed
relevant parties to meet in easily
accessible, supportive, comfortable, "neutral" surroundings;
moreover, NEW's downtown
location gave greater public visibility to nonprofit activities
in the community.
4. Organizational Training & Consultation:
NEW began providing low-cost training sessions,
consultation for local agencies, and county-wide conferences for
the nonprofit community to
enhance their performance, expand their activities, and network
with other kindred agencies.
References:
Dundjerski, M. (1997). Foundations offer shelter to
charities. The Chronicle of Philanthropy,
October 2, pp. 9-13.
Molnar, L. A., Grimes, D. R., Edelstein, J., De Pietro, R.,
Sherman, H., Adkins, D. & Tornatzky, L. (1997,
August). Impact of Incubator Investments.
Report from an award from the US Department of Commerce
Economic Development Administration, Project #99-06-07414.
Published by the National Business Incubator
Association, Athens, Ohio, and the University of Michigan
Business School, Ann Arbor, MI.
NBIA (National Business Incubation Association). (1997). What
is NBIA? Public information on
www.nbia.org/whatis.htm, May 23, 1997.
Sharir, M. (1997, January). The Incubator for Social
Innovation Set-Up Plan. Jerusalem: JDC (Joint Distribution
Committee)-ISRAEL.
Vinokur-Kaplan, D. & Connor, J. A. (1997, December). The
Capacity, Life Cycle & Impact of a Nonprofit
Incubator: A Case Study Of NEW - Nonprofit Enterprise at Work,
Inc.. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting
of ARNOVA (Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations
& Voluntary Action), Indianapolis,
IN.
En setiembre de 1990, las Naciones Unidas convocaron a una
Cumbre Mundial en favor
de la Infancia. Allí jefes de Estado y de Gobierno se
comprometieron a alcanzar en sus países una
serie de metas específicas en favor del bienestar
físico y mental de los niños para el año
2000. En
ese marco se firmó la Convención Internacional
sobre los Derechos del Niño (CIDN) en la que
se establecieron derechos sociales, económicos, culturales
y civiles para la infancia.
Desde entonces se han impulsado nuevas políticas
sociales basadas en el reconocimiento
de derechos y no el otorgamiento de éstos como meras
concesiones asistenciales.
En el mismo año, el Congreso Argentino, por Ley Nº
23.849, ratifica la Convención
Internacional sobre Derechos del Niño y en el mes de
agosto de 1994 la incorpora a la
Constitución Nacional en el art. 75, inc. 22. Para esta
fecha comenzó a funcionar dentro del
Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires
(para esa fecha Municipalidad de la
ciudad de Buenos
Aires) la Defensoría para Niños y
Adolescentes cuyo objetivo inicial fue la defensa de los mismos
en los Tribunales de la Capital Federal, pero que al ampliar su
área de cobertura se dedicó además
a la difusión y promoción de la
Convención.
La complejidad de las problemáticas que llegaban a la
Defensoría, definió que no bastaba
con la atención legal, sino que era indispensable el
trabajo entre distintas disciplinas y con otros
actores sociales (ONGs)para poder elaborar estrategias de
intervención en función del interés del
niño y del adolescente involucrado.
En este contexto, se decidió profundizar el significado
de las problemáticas junto a los
actores de la sociedad civil y los Organismos no
Gubernamentales.
La presente ponencia es parte de una de investigación
que se está llevando a cabo por la
Defensoría, Mutual Barracas y Mutual Almagro (éstas
últimas ONGs).
Concentra su mirada en el tema de los niños y
adolescentes como sujetos de derechos;
pretende conocer los cambios que han experimentado algunas de las
ONGs dedicadas al tema de
la infancia, su relación con el Estado (en particular con
la Defensoría) y la influencia que han
tenido en el discurso y la política de la niñez y
la adolescencia dentro del ámbito de la Ciudad de
Buenos Aires y con aquellos sectores de niños y
jóvenes expuestos a un mayor grado de exclusión
dentro del conjunto social. Además intenta analizar el
papel que han jugado los procesos de
participación ciudadana como así movimientos y
luchas por la infancia.
Metodología
Se ha utilizado metodología mayoritariamente de tipo
cualitativa: entrevistas a
representantes de ONGs, funcionarios gubernamentales y a la
población beneficiaria (niños y
adolescentes), análisis de hechos concretos y su
repercusión en el conjunto social.
Letter = W
Context and Intention
In Switzerland, the method of microcensus of households is
only beginning to show an
impact on the empirical analysis of social phenomena such as the
Third Sector. Under these
circumstances, information on volunteering and charitable giving,
and data on the nonprofit
economy in general until now had to be drawn from national
account statistics and other official
publications.
During the past couple of years, however, the rapidly changing
situation of the economy
has pressured more and more nonprofit organizations to take a
closer look at the structure of
charitable giving as an important element of their income. For
both 1996 and 1997 a
representative microcensus on charitable giving was conducted,
each based on a representative
sample of 2000 telephone interviews.
The intention of this paper is to present some preliminary
research findings to a community
of researchers for critical review. Although Switzerland is a
relatively small country of c.
7.3 million inhabitants the census offers an interesting
example of a culturally diverse
society and of a semi-direct (as opposed to a parliamentary)
democracy. These features alone make
the study worthwhile in an international context.
Focus
The evaluation of the interviews covers primarily the
following aspects of charitable
giving:
what is the economic contribution of private charitable
giving, meaning what is the
"annual turnover" in this field, or what is the "market share" of
the private contributions within
the Third Sector in Switzerland? (for instance in relation to
total household expenditure for
specific consumer goods);
what are the targets of charitable giving as expressed
by the field of activity of the
organizations that receive the money? (environmental
organizations, organizations for the
handicapped, welfare organizations, cultural and recreational
organizations etc.);
what is the motivation behind charitable giving (or not
giving at all)?;
at is the relationship existing between charitable
giving and volunteering, i.e.
between giving money and giving time ?
Findings
As an introduction to the entire results of the study -
percentages, relations, possible
explanations and comparisons to other studies here are
some key figures:
Among the 60% of people who do donate money to charities, the
average amount given
is SFr. 410.- ($273). As a projection on overall Swiss households
(about 3'080'000 in '97), this
equals an average amount of SFr. 456.- ($304) per household, or
242.- ($161) per capita (over
15 years old).
Or in other words:
Approximately 1.406 Billion Swiss Francs ($1 Billion) is the
overall amount of money
given by individuals to non profit organizations in 1997 - about
the equivalent to what the Swiss
annually spend on beer, double the amount spent on chocolate and
only half of the money spent
on smoking cigarettes.
It has long been recognized that the eradication of poverty
in the Third World countries,
especially in their rural areas, is the main challenge facing
human society. Hence, at the
independence of these countries about four decades ago, the state
embarked on tackling this
seemingly age-old problem. The available literature, however,
shows that the vices of poverty
have continued to bite or even worsened, more so in Africa. This
can partly be attributed to the
centralized and non-participatory approaches the state has relied
on in tackling the problem.
In the midst of this scenario, the voluntary sector is
steadily emerging as an alternative to
the state in combating rural poverty. This contention is
illustrated by a case study of Women's
groups in Western Kenya. The study shows that these groups are
increasingly becoming
instrumental in the provision of basic services to the rural
poor, particularly water, food security,
credit, agricultural extension, public health and social welfare
needs. In the circumstances,
Women's groups are proving to be more viable mechanisms for
combating rural poverty than the
state, apparently due to the participatory approach that is
embedded in their activities. The paper
concludes that this is a significant pointer to the role of the
voluntary sector in combating rural
poverty in the developing countries.
The paper heavily relies on field data collected in two
separate surveys in Western Kenya.
The first was done between May and July, 1995 while the second
was done between November,
1996 and January 1997. Rapid Rural Assessment (RRA) methodology
was used in both surveys
to assess the activities and performance of community-based
organizations in rural development.
This primary data is supplemented with some secondary data.
The objective of this paper is to explore the usefulness of
certain theoretical approaches
for explaining the role and place of the third sector in a
comparative perspective. Our contribution
to the development of theory regarding the third sector takes as
its starting point a political
economy approach and in particular, theories developed to explain
welfare state divergence. Three
specific theoretical approaches will be taken up in the paper:
These include (a) "path dependency",
referring to institutional legacies and dynamics; (b) political
mobilization, or the coalition-building
capacities of collective social agents; and (c) political and
civic culture. By applying these
approaches to a comparison of social policy domains in two
different societies, we attempt to
specify the contexts in which the third sector takes up a
particular position and role (or not), and
particularly, to analyse the mobilizing capacity of the third
sector itself, and thus, its own impact
on policy development in certain domains. We will present the
early results of research in which
we compared the role and place of the third in three policy
domains, across two societies
sufficiently distinct with respect to variables associated with
the development of social policy.The
areas of (1) mental health (service planning and delivery); (2)
workfare (the third sector as an
economic sector) and (3) immigrant integration (ethnic community
groups) were thus compared
across two Canadian provinces, Quebec and Ontario.
Preliminary results suggest that path dependency and civic
culture make an important
contribution to determining the role and place of the third
sector, but political mobilisation and
coalition building account for important differences from one
policy domain to another.
The Third Sector is of central importance in each of Ireland's
two jurisdictions and offers
fascinating scope for policy analysis. Since the division of
Ireland in 1922 in the Republic of
Ireland the state has worked closely with the voluntary sector,
and in particular with religious
orders, in the delivery of social, health and educational
services. More recently it has developed
partnership mechanisms for working closely with disadvantaged
communities. In Northern
Ireland, by contrast, during the period from the end of World War
II until 1979 and the advent
of Margaret Thatcher's Conservative Administration the Third
Sector had a marginal role in
relation to the state. Since that time, and particularly since
the early 1990s, Third Sector
organizations have moved much closer to the centre of social
policy and the retrenchment of the
Welfare State has meant that many services in N. Ireland (as in
other parts of the United
Kingdom) are delivered by Third Sector organizations.
Now governments in each jurisdiction are actively considering
their relations with the
voluntary and community sector. Northern Ireland has been
particularly innovative in the field of
policy development. Since 1993 public policy toward the Third
Sector has been guided by
Government's Strategy for the Support of the Voluntary
Sector and of Community Development.
This has involved a fundamental re-appraisal by government of its
role vis a vis communities
which dispute the legitimacy of the British administration in N.
Ireland. Government has moved
from a position where its policies tended to marginalize
voluntary and community associations
linked to paramilitary organizations. Under both Conservative and
Labour administrations in the
1990s, the Northern Ireland administration has adopted an
strongly supportive stance towards the
Third Sector and government now works in close partnership with
disadvantaged communities and
their organizations to deliver services and to plan and implement
policy.
In the Republic of Ireland the government promised in 1990 to
produce a formal charter
which would provide a statement of the role of the Third Sector,
its arrangements with the state
and arrangements for its support. Since that time there have
been successive, but ineffectual,
attempts under different governments to formulate and publish a
comprehensive policy statement
on the relationship of the community and voluntary sector with
the state. In May 1997
government published a discussion paper or "Green Paper",
Supporting Voluntary Activity. This
document reflects concern about the deep differentiations which
exist in Irish society and the
increasing marginalization of some communities. It acknowledges
the need to create a more
participatory democracy in Ireland and to foster active
citizenship and acknowledges the potential
of Third Sector organizations in this regard. It proposes the
creation of new institutional measures
to support Third Sector organizations and measures to strengthen
the capacity of government
departments to relate to voluntary and community associations.
It proposes the establishment of
a nation-wide independent community trust to strengthen the
funding mechanisms for voluntary
action.
The paper will identify themes common to both jurisdictions in
Ireland and will discuss
these in the context of international trends in relations between
government and Third Sector
organizations. In particular it will discuss the influence of
the European Union's social policies
on the development of the community and voluntary sector in each
part of Ireland and will identify
points of comparison and contrast between the approaches of the
Irish government in Dublin and
the British administration in Belfast. It will draw from
published and unpublished sources and
informants in Dublin and Belfast and will build on the writer's
earlier work in Gidron et. al.
(1992).
Department of Health and Social Services (1993), Strategy
for the Support of the Voluntary Sector
and for Community Development in Northern Ireland, HMSO,
Belfast. Kearney, Jimmy, (1995,
"The development of government policy and its strategy toward the
voluntary and community
sectors [in Northern Ireland]" in Acheson, Nicholas and Arthur
Williamson, Voluntary Action and
Social Policy in Northern Ireland, Avebury, Aldershot.
Supporting Voluntary Activity: a green
paper on the community and voluntary sector and its relationship
with the state (1997). The
Stationery Office, Dublin. Williamson, Arthur, (1992), "The
voluntary sector's central role in
managing societal instability in Northern Ireland" in Gidron, B.
Kramer, R. and Salamon, L
(eds.), Government and the Third Sector, Jossey-Bass,
San Francisco, pp. 120-146.
Letter = X, Y, Z
This paper investigates the direction and the size of
international philanthropic transfers
(IPT hereafter) from Japan, as a part of the international
comparative study on IPT which has been
organized by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.
As the Japanese economy becomes more integrated into the
world economy, the volume
of cross-border economic flows in the form of goods and services,
capital and labor has been
increasing substantially. Along with this development,
cross-border philanthropic transfers to and
from Japan may have been increasing as well. While IPT can be two
ways: incoming transfers and
outgoing transfers, this paper focuses only on the outgoing
philanthropic flows from Japan.
We have tried to estimate the size and the direction of IPT
at both the micro and macro
level. First is macro approach. We attempt to estimate the macro
level IPT by using the data on
current and capital transfers in the balance of payment
statistics and the system of national
accounts (SNA). The micro level IPT are estimated using data from
individual economic actors,
such as for-profit corporations, nonprofit foundations and
government bodies. Roughly speaking
macro approach gives an upper bound estimate, whereas micro
approach provides a lower bound
estimate.
We identify and classify various routes of IPT in Japan.
While for-profit corporations
and individuals have a quite limited role in IPT, various
foundations and NGOs play substantial
roles. The public sector not only directly provide IPT directly,
but also indirectly contribute to
IPT, through subsidizing many NGOs and foundations.
The structure of this paper is as follows: First, we
discuss the definition and the
classification of IPTs (Section I). Then the aggregated size and
direction of IPT will be estimated
with macro-type data (Section II). Micro data is exploited to
estimate a detail picture of IPT by
grant-making foundations, central and local governments, and
for-profit corporations (Section III).
We also provide detailed case studies of major organizations
which engage in IPT, based on partly
using interviews of key personnel in selected philanthropic
bodies which have a leading role in
IPT outflows from Japan (Section IV). We then discuss policy
issues such as the tax system that
impact IPTs (Section V), and finally we give a summary and
conclusion of the paper (Section VI).
Ukraine, a country with population of 52 million, declared
independence in August 1991.
Six Years that followed have taken the country through a
continuing series of crises that have
virtually engulfed every sphere of its life, brought with them
the disintegration of the country's
social infrastructure.
Ukrainian population is in a state of trauma after the massive
social, political and economic
changes that have occurred. An excessive wealth accumulation of a
part of the population and a
sharp lowering of living standards of the other part (the so
called marginalization) ruins social
stability and leads to disappointment in democratic ideals
nationwide.
Historically the social policy of Ukraine has foreordained the
state's responsibility for the
provision of public good. Networks of mutual support based on
traditional links of reciprocity
within communities that existed through all the history of
Ukrainian nation pre-empted the need
for charitable organizations. Private philanthropy played only
additional role by distributing
occasional gifts of money or food for actively deserving poor.
Through long years of colonization
of this region philanthropic organizations lacked charters and
were not limited to charity, but also
engaged in political, often clandestine activities.
Nonprofit organizations have recently become a recognized
phenomenon in the
post-socialist Eastern Europe. Observing the growth of
independent associations in the years of
perestroyka, our Western counterparts named them the nonprofit
sector, although their economic
functions were low on the list of their organizational agendas.
Nonprofits brought attention to
themselves due to their practice of defending elementary civil,
political and human rights while
fostering people's organizations and movements.
|